So I just heard that some high school fired their water polo coach because a parent complained that he was gay. Now that alone is enough to arouse my anger. But, there's more. See, it wasn't just his sexuality that got him fired. The source claimed what the parent was griping about, was his "gay lifestyle." Now I'm really mad.
Other than the usual list of slurs people just love to hurl at gay people, "lifestyle" is the word I hate the most. I can not, and probably never will, understand how being gay just completely defines one's lifestyle.
Besides the obvious difference in sexual preference, there really is no difference between homo/bisexuals and heterosexuals.
Now I understand that for a select few, sexuality does define who they are. But somehow, I doubt that they live their lives any different from a heterosexual person.
I'm bisexual myself. But if I were gay or straight, I assure you, my "lifestyle" would be no different from yours.
I wake up, eat, and go about my life, trying to make something of myself. Isn't that what pretty much everybody in America does? Does sexuality really have any bearing on what you do with your life? Does who you love really make a difference? I tend to think not. Maybe for a small handful of people, but no matter how many people it is, I still hate that word.
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Saturday, June 25, 2011
Thank You, New York
Tonight, the state of New York has officially legalized same-sex marriage. The fight for equal rights is one step closer to being won.
And of course, as with any mention of the LGBT community at all, the haters come pouring in. And by haters, I mean hateful, bigoted, bible-heads who are quick to remind us that this is apparently a Christian nation, governed by the one and only God. Not Congress.
Despite the fact that the First Amendment clearly states that Congress shall make no law respecting any religion. Despite the fact that we have separation of church and state. Despite the fact that nobody is required to be forced to worship your God.
God is not going to punish us. I highly doubt an all-loving God would ever harm any of His people simply because they are looking beyond this outdated concept of inequality and hatred.
The "fags," as you say, are not ruining this nation, as you also say. The fact that they now have the same constitutional rights as you shouldn't make your own pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness any more difficult. They may be fags, but at least they're not hating anybody for being themselves. At least they don't harrass people they don't know, for things beyond their control.
What they REALLY do, is exactly what you do, minus the hate.
To the people who voted "yes" on this bill, thank you. To the people who voted "no," shame on you. Shame on you for not supporting equality, shame on you for not thinking we really should be the land of the free. Shame on you for thinking millions of Americans should be denied this basic Constitutional right because of something beyond their control. And shame on you for thinking it's okay to discriminate against millions of LGBT couples simply because you're a hateful, narrow-minded bigot. Shame on you for being an enemy of freedom.
It's okay for you to be a religious individual, but it's NOT okay to use that as an excuse for hatred and discrimination.
But, despite your arrogance, I still thank New York for approving what should have been approved since day one. It's been a long time coming. I hope every other hate state will follow suit, and all American LGBTs will have the right to marry who they love.
And of course, as with any mention of the LGBT community at all, the haters come pouring in. And by haters, I mean hateful, bigoted, bible-heads who are quick to remind us that this is apparently a Christian nation, governed by the one and only God. Not Congress.
Despite the fact that the First Amendment clearly states that Congress shall make no law respecting any religion. Despite the fact that we have separation of church and state. Despite the fact that nobody is required to be forced to worship your God.
God is not going to punish us. I highly doubt an all-loving God would ever harm any of His people simply because they are looking beyond this outdated concept of inequality and hatred.
The "fags," as you say, are not ruining this nation, as you also say. The fact that they now have the same constitutional rights as you shouldn't make your own pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness any more difficult. They may be fags, but at least they're not hating anybody for being themselves. At least they don't harrass people they don't know, for things beyond their control.
What they REALLY do, is exactly what you do, minus the hate.
To the people who voted "yes" on this bill, thank you. To the people who voted "no," shame on you. Shame on you for not supporting equality, shame on you for not thinking we really should be the land of the free. Shame on you for thinking millions of Americans should be denied this basic Constitutional right because of something beyond their control. And shame on you for thinking it's okay to discriminate against millions of LGBT couples simply because you're a hateful, narrow-minded bigot. Shame on you for being an enemy of freedom.
It's okay for you to be a religious individual, but it's NOT okay to use that as an excuse for hatred and discrimination.
But, despite your arrogance, I still thank New York for approving what should have been approved since day one. It's been a long time coming. I hope every other hate state will follow suit, and all American LGBTs will have the right to marry who they love.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Sean Avery Supports Marriage Equality
It was recently released by ESPN New York that Rangers' forward Sean Avery publicly voiced his support for marriage equality. Yeah, that's right. The ever-so-touchy subject of gay marriage.
As a fellow supporter of equal rights for all Americans and humans alike, naturally I am all for this. I have made it quite clear that I believe all people, regardless of sexual orientation, deserve the right to marry the person they love, regardless of gender.
My views of gender equality apply just about everywhere. Sports included. Genetics dictating one's gender should not dictate one's ability to play hockey or basketball or whatever. Just look at the NCAA's women's divisions. The WNBA. Canada's own women's hockey league. Athletics don't discriminate. American law shouldn't either.
It's no secret I've been pretty harsh on Sean Avery over the years, thanks to his actions on the ice. But, like with most players, that does not carry over to his life off the ice.
Avery is not the only professional athlete to speak out in support of equality.
Baltimore Ravens' linebacker Brendon Ayanbadejo released a similar video for the same cause in Maryland.
Phoenix Suns players Jared Dudley and Grant Hill filmed public service announcements addressing homophobic language among teenagers that will be aired during the NBA conference finals.
So far, there have been no gay athletes in the four major professional sports, at least none that have come out yet. Though the NBA's Dennis Rodman announced at a point that he was bisexual. And let's not forget TNA Wrestling's Orlando Jordan.
And sexual orientation has always been something of a taboo subject in the sports world.
But, with the help of Avery and his fellow athletes also in support of the fight for equal rights, we can only hope that eventually, homophobia in the locker rooms can be a thing of the past.
Thank you, Sean Avery.
As a fellow supporter of equal rights for all Americans and humans alike, naturally I am all for this. I have made it quite clear that I believe all people, regardless of sexual orientation, deserve the right to marry the person they love, regardless of gender.
My views of gender equality apply just about everywhere. Sports included. Genetics dictating one's gender should not dictate one's ability to play hockey or basketball or whatever. Just look at the NCAA's women's divisions. The WNBA. Canada's own women's hockey league. Athletics don't discriminate. American law shouldn't either.
It's no secret I've been pretty harsh on Sean Avery over the years, thanks to his actions on the ice. But, like with most players, that does not carry over to his life off the ice.
Avery is not the only professional athlete to speak out in support of equality.
Baltimore Ravens' linebacker Brendon Ayanbadejo released a similar video for the same cause in Maryland.
Phoenix Suns players Jared Dudley and Grant Hill filmed public service announcements addressing homophobic language among teenagers that will be aired during the NBA conference finals.
So far, there have been no gay athletes in the four major professional sports, at least none that have come out yet. Though the NBA's Dennis Rodman announced at a point that he was bisexual. And let's not forget TNA Wrestling's Orlando Jordan.
And sexual orientation has always been something of a taboo subject in the sports world.
But, with the help of Avery and his fellow athletes also in support of the fight for equal rights, we can only hope that eventually, homophobia in the locker rooms can be a thing of the past.
Thank you, Sean Avery.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Women in the Military
Okay, boys and girls, it's time for yet another griping session about equal rights or whatever...
St. Louis' Fox affiliate, on their Facebook page, claims a recent report says women should be allowed on the front lines of military combat. They then proceeded to ask if this is a good idea.
My initial reaction: since when are women not allowed to serve on the front lines? I may not know everything about military protocol, but I'd think all soldiers are given equal opportunities. But, I forgot, this is 2011. Americans still don't have much of a grasp on the concept of equality.
I have a question: how are women unfit to be on front lines? Don't they go through training just like the male soldiers? If a soldier can't pass training, they don't go. It's that simple. Gender is irrelevant. Why are we still discussing what rights women should have?
St. Louis' Fox affiliate, on their Facebook page, claims a recent report says women should be allowed on the front lines of military combat. They then proceeded to ask if this is a good idea.
My initial reaction: since when are women not allowed to serve on the front lines? I may not know everything about military protocol, but I'd think all soldiers are given equal opportunities. But, I forgot, this is 2011. Americans still don't have much of a grasp on the concept of equality.
I have a question: how are women unfit to be on front lines? Don't they go through training just like the male soldiers? If a soldier can't pass training, they don't go. It's that simple. Gender is irrelevant. Why are we still discussing what rights women should have?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)